Skip to main content

DNA methylation signatures of severe RSV infection in infants: evidence from non-invasive saliva samples

Abstract

Background

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) poses significant morbidity and mortality risks in childhood, particularly for previously healthy infants admitted to hospitals lacking predisposing risk factors for severe disease. This study aimed to investigate the role of the host epigenome in RSV infection severity using non-invasive buccal swabs from sixteen hospitalized infants admitted to the hospital for RSV infection. Eight patients had severe symptoms, and eight had mild to moderate symptoms. For DNA methylation analyses, the Illumina EPIC BeadChip was used with DNA isolated from saliva samples. To evaluate the basal DNA methylation level of the identified biomarkers a cohort of healthy control children was used. Furthermore, DNA methylation levels of candidate genes were confirmed by pyrosequencing in both the discovery and validation cohorts of patients with mild to moderate symptoms.

Results

A panel of differentially methylated positions (DMPs) distinguishing severe from mild to moderate symptoms in infants was identified. DMPs were determined using a threshold of an adjusted P-value (false discovery rate, FDR) < 0.01 and an absolute difference in DNA methylation (delta beta) > 0.10. Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified in the ZBTB38 (implicated in asthma and pulmonary disease) and the TRIM6-TRM34 gene region (associated with viral infections). The differential DNA methylation of these genes was validated in an independent replication cohort. A weighted correlation network analysis emphasized the pivotal role of a module with RAB11FIP5 as the hub gene, known for its critical function in regulating viral infections.

Conclusions

Oral mucosa methylation may play a role in determining the severity of RSV disease in infants.

Background

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), the primary cause of acute lower respiratory infections (ALRIs) in young children across the globe, infects almost all children by the age of two and is responsible for a considerable number of infant hospitalizations [1,2,3,4]. Although most RSV hospitalizations occur in previously healthy children born at term, current prevention strategies still primarily focus on specific at-risk children [5]. Evidence suggests that the severity of RSV bronchiolitis occurring in infancy could be associated with immunological mechanisms [6]. In fact, RSV infections occur more frequently in the first years of life when the immune system is immature.

Understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms of RSV infection and the resulting immune response is important for developing more effective treatments and preventive measures.

While several studies have been carried out on host genome susceptibility to RSV infection [7, 8] and gene expression [9,10,11], only a few of them have been performed in the field of epigenomics [12]. Epigenetic regulation serves as a dynamic interface between the genome and the environment. Thus, in the context of viral or bacterial infections, the regulation of host defense cells by epigenetic mechanisms is directly linked to the development of the disease [13]. Evidence suggests that epigenetic processes play a critical role in modulating the interaction between the host and the causal pathogen [14].

Recently, we have demonstrated the role of blood DNA methylation (DNAm) in the development of respiratory sequelae after RSV infection [15]. One year later, in 2023, Zhaozhong Zhu et al. [16] conducted an epigenome wide association study (EWAS) on blood samples to study the DNAm patterns in infants hospitalized with bronchiolitis, 423 of whom were infected by RSV. While blood is widely used in epigenomic biomedical research and is considered a valuable tissue for biomarker discovery, it is important to recognize the advantages of alternative sample types. Saliva, in particular, has gained attention due to its non-invasive collection process, particularly for research studies involving children. In recent years, saliva and buccal swabs samples have emerged as crucial samples in different areas of medical research, particularly for neurodegenerative diseases [17, 18], due to its ability to reflect brain-related biological processes [19].

Saliva is an attractive, accessible source of cells from which a high quantity and quality of DNA/RNA can be obtained. It is known that both white blood cells originating from mesoderm and epithelial cells from ectoderm are present in the mouth [20]. Despite these data, very few studies exist in the literature on the identification of molecular host factors in saliva in the context of infections [21, 22]. Recent studies have provided evidence that RSV, as other respiratory viruses, is frequently detected in saliva and sputum samples [23]. However, no research have explored the potential of using buccal swab to investigate DNAm signatures associated with RSV disease or used epigenomics in this context.

Methods

Aim of the study

We aimed to investigate the role of host DNA methylation (DNAm) in the severity of RSV infection using buccal swab samples collected from patients with mild/moderate and severe symptoms during the acute phase of infection. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that DNAm has been explored to study RSV severity in buccal swab samples.

Study design

Sixteen patients with RSV infection were chosen from a cohort that was prospectively enrolled in an observational study conducted in Spain, facilitated by a national hospital-based research network for pediatric respiratory research called GENDRES (Genetics, Vitamin D and Respiratory Infections Research Network—www.gendres.org). RSV infection was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) upon presentation to the hospital. A saliva ORAGENE buccal swab sample was collected from each participant during the acute phase of RSV infection, typically within seven days of symptom onset.

Table 1 presents the clinical history and characteristics of the study subjects. The clinical severity of the disease was determined based on the need for intensive care, invasive respiratory support, and the ReSViNET score [24]. The ReSViNET score, used as a parameter of severity classification, is a clinical scoring system used to assess patients’ severity of acute respiratory infections (ARIs). Seven parameters were considered: feeding intolerance, medical intervention, respiratory difficulty, respiratory frequency, apnea, general condition, and fever. Each parameter is assigned a value ranging from 0 to 3, resulting in a total score of 20 points.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the study participants

The RSV cases were obtained from a cohort of more than 3000 patients, over half of whom were infected with RSV. To select severe RSV cases, children with well-defined severity, such as acute bronchiolitis (lower respiratory tract infection [LRTI]), who have the highest ReSViNET score (> 15), who require mechanical ventilation, and who spend the most time in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) were chosen. The moderate/mild group was formed by selecting children who only required a few days of hospitalization (less than 5), did not require any kind of respiratory support, and had a ReSViNET score less than 8. This group of children was diagnosed with both LRTI and upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs).

Sample processing

DNA was isolated from saliva samples following the prepIT-L2L (DNAgenotek) protocol. The buccal swabs were incubated at 50 °C in a water incubator for at least one hour. The saliva sample was then transferred to a microcentrifuge tube and mixed with a 1/25 volume of PT-L2P. The mixture was vortexed and incubated on ice. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, and ethanol was added to allow DNA precipitation. Subsequently, an ethanol wash was performed, and the DNA pellet was then dissolved in TE solution. After isolation, the DNA sample concentration and quality were checked using common Nanodrop measurements and Qubit. Because DNA in buccal swabs tends to be more degraded than blood DNA, further DNA degradation control was performed to ensure the optimal DNA concentration for the subsequent steps. The whole Illumina methylation EPIC BeadChip experiment was carried out at the Genómica e Investigación Oncológica (GENYO) Center (Granada; Spain). The epigenome data were delivered to our group at Santiago de Compostela for subsequent bioinformatic and statistical analysis.

An appropriate volume of concentrated DNA was subjected to bisulphite conversion, a gold standard technique that allows the deamination of non-methylated cytosines into uracil and prevents methylation of the cytosine. After this treatment, the subsequent amplification recognized uracil as thymine and methylated cytosines as cytosines. The level of DNAm was then calculated by quantitative genotyping of C/T SNPs. After hybridization to the Illumina methylation EPIC BeadChip platform, the fluorescence intensity resulting from the incorporation of a nucleotide in the probe is translated into a level of DNAm for each CpG site. DNAm can be defined as beta- or M-values. Beta values range between 0 and 1, where 0 represents non-methylation, and 1 represents 100% methylation. Beta values are used for graphics due to their easy interpretability. M-values, on the other hand, are logit-transformed beta values; homoscedasticity is generally assumed for these values, and they are preferentially used for linear statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

Methylation data analysis

Before calculating the beta- and M-values, the raw IDAT data were subjected to different filtering processes and normalization steps, as previously described [15], to obtain high-quality data suitable for downstream analysis.

In the analysis of DNAm data derived from ‘bulk’ tissues such as blood or saliva, it is crucial to estimate the composition of different cell types within the tissue. Since the measured DNAm in ‘bulk’ tissues represents an average of the methylation levels from multiple cell types, there is a risk that the overall DNAm level is predominantly influenced by specific cell types. Moreover, when employing saliva as a biomarker identification tool, it is important to consider its extreme cellular heterogeneity. It has been demonstrated that buccal swabs used to collect saliva samples contain a greater proportion of epithelial cells than saliva, and this proportion is greater in children than in adults. Therefore, estimating the cell composition is an essential step in this type of analysis. Here, we used the Epidish R package to estimate the cell composition of the buccal swab samples. The hepidish function of the Epidish R package, allowing the use of two different DNAm references, was applied to the beta values to specifically estimate epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and total immune cells (neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, and natural killer [NK] cells) [25, 26].

Identification of RSV severity-associated differential methylation

The Limma package [27] was used to identify differentially methylated positions (DMPs), employing a model adjusted for age, sex, and cell estimation. To account for age, we included it as a covariate in the linear model formula. This allowed us to estimate the effect of other variables while controlling for the effect of age. Specifically, we created a design matrix including age as a covariate and fitted a linear model using the lmFit() function. A previous episode of bronchiolitis, which occurred in five out of eight mild/moderate patients, was considered in the statistical analysis to evaluate the effect of this clinical factor. The threshold for identifying DMPs was set at an adjusted P-value (false discovery rate or FDR) of < 0.01 and an absolute difference in DNAm between groups (delta beta) of > 0.10. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the most significant candidate DMPs, and the determined area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess their discriminatory potential.

To identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs), the DMRcate package [28] was utilized with default parameters. The package employs Gaussian kernel smoothing to detect patterns of differential methylation independent of genomic annotation. In this study, a bandwidth (λ) of 1000 base pairs and a scaling factor (C) of 2 were used. Despite working with a sparse set of sites, the aim was to identify regions with multiple probe clusters (minimum of 3 CpGs per region) exhibiting substantial effect sizes and a minimum smoothed FDR < 0.01.

To establish a baseline sample of healthy controls (HC) for comparison, DNAm data from a cohort of healthy children were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), under accession number GSE252169 [29]. This dataset was generated using the Illumina HumanMethylationEPIC BeadChip (GPL21145 platform). For the analysis, we only retained methylated profiles of buccal DNA samples from healthy offspring of no-smokers pregnant women, collected at three different time points: birth (n = 27), 12 months (n = 14), and 60 months (five years of age; n = 10).

The data were loaded into R using the GEOquery package. The raw IDAT files were preprocessed following the established protocol described previously. Beta and M values, were filtered to remove low-quality probes and normalized before proceeding with downstream analysis.

Pathway analysis

For gene set enrichment analysis, the methylGSA package [30] was applied, which uses the methylglm function.

This function extends GOglm by incorporating gene length as a covariate to adjust length bias in DNAm based on the number of CpGs. Pathway enrichment analysis was customized in two ways: considering all CpGs regardless of their gene group and focusing only on CpGs within the promoters based on the annotation in the “IlluminaHumanMethylationEPICanno.ilm10b4.hg19regions” (TSS200, TSS1500, 5’UTR, 1stExon).

Weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA)

The WGCNA package [31] was used to construct a signed weighted correlation network, using the top 20% of positions with the highest median variance (approximately 120,000). To identify the gene module with the strongest association with RSV severity, a series of steps were performed. First, the soft threshold power was selected based on standard scale-free networks, and a power function was used to calculate all differential CpGs. The adjacency matrix was then transformed into a topological overlap matrix (TOM), and the corresponding dissimilarity matrix (1-TOM) was calculated. The dynamic tree cut method was employed to hierarchically cluster CpGs and identify the module, with a minimum module size of 30, medium sensitivity for cluster splitting, and a dendrogram cut height threshold of 0.25 for module merging as module detection parameters. Unassigned CpG sites were clustered in the “grey” module, which was not considered for further analyses. Gene significance (GS) was computed to detect statistically significant associations between modules and phenotype, and module membership (MM) was also calculated as a measure of intramodular connectivity by correlating (using Pearson correlation) the methylation profile with the eigengene of a given module. The correlation between GS and MM was investigated, and the average absolute gene significance for all CpGs within a module was determined to identify the most important modules. The modules were named according to their most significant hub genes. Furthermore, the hub genes of the RSV severity-associated modules were extracted, and an overrepresentation analysis of the most important module related to the trait was performed using the ClusterProfiler R package [32] and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database as a reference to investigate its biological significance.

Pyrosequencing methylation analysis

The DNAm pattern of the identified DMPs was assessed by bisulfite-pyrosequencing in the discovery cohort, along with an independent validation cohort consisting of 14 patients (7 severe, 7 mild/moderate). Genomic DNA was bisulfite-converted using the EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Bisulfite-treated DNA was amplified using the PyroMark PCR Kit (Qiagen) in a 25 µL reaction volume. Forward and reverse PCR primers were designed to target the same DMPs identified in the microarray analysis. Following PCR amplification, pyrosequencing assays were performed in duplicate (technical replicates) in sequential runs on the PyroMark Q24 system (Qiagen) using PyroMark Gold Q24 Reagents (Qiagen). The sequencing primers (Primer S) are detailed in Table S1. Pyrosequencing was conducted by the Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB).

The R statistical software (v. 4.2.2) was used to perform all the statistical analyses.

Results

Clinical characteristics of patients

Table 1 describes the clinical characteristics of the patients. Most of these characteristics exhibited similarities between the two severity groups. Clinical severity factors, such as the ReSViNET score, PICU admission, and the requirement for mechanical ventilation, were found to be significantly different between the two groups, as expected. Another statistically significant factor was age, with infants in the severe group being younger than those in the mild/moderate group. To investigate the association between the observed severity in the subjects and their “biological age” (i.e. the actual age of cells rather than the chronological one), we employed age predictors. Specifically, we utilized the Pediatric-Buccal-Epigenetic (PedBE) clock, an epigenetic age estimator designed for pediatric buccal swab samples [33]. Through this analysis, we found a strong correlation (rho, ρ = 0.96; P-value < 0.0001) between DNAm age and chronological age (see the scatterplot in Supplementary Fig. 1A). Consequently, we did not observe statistically significant differences in predicted biological age between the mild/moderate and severe groups, as depicted in Supplementary Fig. 1B. To mitigate confounding effects on the results, age was considered a covariate in all analyses.

Identification of differentially methylated positions and regions within the ZBTB38 and TRIM6-TRIM34 genes

The estimation of cell composition did not reveal any significant differences between the two cohorts. Therefore, to minimize potential confounding factors, age was the only significant variable adjusted in the linear model. Among the 803,527 total DNA probes analyzed, we identified 461 DMPs (assuming a nominal P-value < 0.01 and an absolute difference in methylation level [Delta Beta] > 0.10) between infants with severe infection and those with only mild/moderate symptoms (Table S2). Among these positions, the majority (n = 339, 73.5%) exhibited hypomethylation in the severe group compared to the mild/moderate group, while the remaining (n = 122, 26.5%) showed hypermethylation. These DMPs enabled the differentiation of patient methylation profiles into two distinct groups according to principal component analysis (PCA) and a heatmap (Fig. 1A, B). The main difference in the PCA results was from the first principal component (PC1), which accounted for 68.7% of the variation.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Differentially methylated positions distinguish infants with severe infection from those with mild to moderate symptoms. A PCA and B Heatmap of the significant DMPs (nominal P-value < 0.01 and delta beta > 0.10) between the severe and mild/moderate groups

Notably, we also identified clusters of DMPs within promoter regions belonging to the same gene. Specifically, we found seven positions in the 5’UTR of the ZBTB38 gene (Table 2 and Fig. 2A) and three positions within the TSS200 region of the TRIM6-TRIM34 gene (Table 2 and Fig. 2B).

Table 2 Cluster of differentially methylated positions (DMPs) within the TRIM6-TRIM34 and ZBTB38 genes
Fig. 2
figure 2

Hypomethylation of the ZBTB38 and TRIM genes in the severe group. Boxplot and ROC curve of the cluster of CpGs observed within A ZBTB38 and B TRIM6-TRIM34 genes

After adjusting the model for both age and bronchiolitis, we observed a decrease in the number of DMPs (n = 129; nominal P-value < 0.01). However, despite this reduction, the top DMPs remained consistent, particularly those located within the ZBTB38 (four positions) and TRIM6-TRIM34 (three positions) genes (Table 2). Additionally, removing patients who had experienced previous episodes of bronchiolitis from the statistical analysis resulted in a slightly different but even larger group of DMPs (n = 465). However, what is more relevant again is the remarkable consistency in the top DMPs and DMRs, pointing to ZBTB38 (with two positions) and TRIM6-TRIM34 (with five positions); (Table 2). This compelling consistency implies that previous episodes of bronchiolitis might not exert a widespread impact on DNAm across the entire mild/moderate cohort, reinforcing the robustness of the findings.

To assess the discriminatory potential of DMPs from these genes (ZBTB38 and TRIM6-TRIM34) as biomarkers of RSV severity, we performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with area under the curve (AUC) calculations. The total ROC curve for the seven DMPs in the ZBTB38 gene yielded an AUC of 0.984 (0.941–1.000), while the ROC curve for the three DMPs within the TRIM6TRIM34 region had an AUC of 0.906 (0.756–1.000). Furthermore, we utilized DMRcate to identify DMRs comprising at least three neighboring CpG sites associated with RSV severity in the same direction. This approach revealed eight regions with decreasing methylation and twelve regions with increasing methylation (Table 3). This analysis detected two highly statistically significant regions (Table 3). The most significant one (false discovery rate or FDR = 2.83 × 10–24) overlaps the TRIM6-TRIM34 genes, and it comprises 11 highly correlated CpGs (Fig. 3A). The second most significant region (FDR of 1.93 × 10–11) overlaps with the ZBTB38 gene; it contains 15 highly correlated CpGs (Fig. 3B).

Table 3 Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with RSV severity
Fig. 3
figure 3

Differentially methylated regions distinguish infants with severe infection from those with mild to moderate symptoms. Top panel: DMR plot for the two most significant DMRs within the A ZBTB38 and B TRIM6-TRIM34 genes. DNA methylation patterns in severe and mild/moderate samples differed for most of the CpGs in the DMRs. In the figure, some beta value dots of the CpGs that constitute the DMRs overlap in the two groups with similar values. Bottom panel: pairwise correlation between CpG sites in DMRs in A ZBTB38 and B TRIM6-TRIM34 genes

To verify the basal DNAm levels of the key genes identified in our analysis, we utilized the GEO dataset GSE252169. This dataset was selected for its availability of DNA buccal samples from healthy children at different time points. Specifically, we assessed the basal methylation profiles of the seven CpGs within ZBTB38 and three CpGs within TRIM6-TRIM34, identified through DMPs and DMRs analysis. The GEO subset cohort used for this study included a group of 27 children who were not exposed to maternal smoking in utero, with DNA samples collected at birth, 12 months, and 60 months. Normalized beta values for the 10 CpGs were extracted from this HC cohort. During preliminary analysis, two CpGs within ZBTB38 (cg25395158 and cg23967605) were removed due to data quality issues. The remaining five CpGs within ZBTB38 were analyzed for their methylation levels at the three time points in the HC cohort and these levels were then compared to the methylation profiles of these CpGs in children with RSV.

As illustrated in Fig. 4, the methylation levels of the five CpGs within ZBTB38 at birth in the HC cohort were similar to those observed in children with mild to moderate symptoms. However, as the children aged, methylation levels at these positions in HC cohort increased, demonstrating an opposite trend to that observed in the RSV cohort, where a decrease in DNAm was detected for children with severe infection when compared to those with only mild to moderate symptoms. The analysis of the three CpGs within TRIM6-TRIM34 is presented in Supplementary Fig. 2.

Fig. 4
figure 4

DNA methylation levels of DMPs within ZBTB38 in RSV and HC cohorts. Boxplots showing DNA methylation levels at five DMPs within ZBTB38 for the RSV cohort compared to the HC cohort from GEO. The HC cohort includes samples collected from children at three-time points: birth, 12 months, and 60 months. The RSV cohort is represented by children with mild to moderate symptoms. Methylation levels at birth are similar to the methylation levels of RSV children with mild to moderate symptoms. For all the CpGs, the HC cohort shows an increase of methylation with age, in contrast to the RSV cohort, where hypomethylation is observed for children severely ill

Pathway analysis

We next investigated gene sets from Reactome, Gene Ontology (GO), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways by considering (i) all CpGs and (ii) only CpGs within promoter regions. Remarkably, for both analyses, significant enrichment was observed in three Reactome pathways, three GO biological processes, and one KEGG pathway (Fig. 5). Notably, all three enriched pathways included olfactory signaling pathways, such as transduction and receptor activity.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Pathway analysis revealed enrichment of pathways associated with olfactory signaling and activation. Bar plot representing the results of the enrichment pathway analysis conducted on all CpGs and specifically on CpGs located within the promoter regions using the methylglm approach. The results were obtained using the KEGG, Reactome and GO databases. The size of each bar along the x-axis indicates the number of genes associated with each pathway. Furthermore, false discovery rate (FDR) P-values are indicated

Technical and biological validation of candidate methylation sites

Seven new patients with severe RSV infection and seven new children with mild to moderate symptoms were selected to evaluate the accuracy of DNAm results obtained from the Illumina EPIC BeadChip assay. Table 4 presents the clinical characteristics of these subjects.

Table 4 The clinical characteristics of mild/moderate and severe patients in the validation cohort

In this new validation cohort, the RESVINET score, need for respiratory support, and PICU admission remained significantly different between severe and mild/moderate cases, consistent with findings from the discovery cohort. To assess the reproducibility of the pyrosequencing assay, technical replicates of the ten DMPs were performed in both the discovery and validation cohorts. Each sample was analyzed in duplicate, and Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the consistency between replicates (Fig. 6). The correlation between duplicates was extremely high in both cohorts, with correlation coefficients of 0.9977 and 0.9965 respectively and a highly significant P-value (< 2.16 × 10−16). These results confirm the robustness and reliability of the pyrosequencing assay in accurately quantifying DNAm levels across different cohorts.

Fig. 6
figure 6

High reproducibility of pyrosequencing technical replicates in discovery and validation cohorts. Correlation plots showing the Pearson correlation between technical replicates for each cohort analyzed using pyrosequencing. Both the Discovery and Validation cohorts demonstrate near-perfect correlation, with Pearson correlation coefficients close to 1 and a highly significant P-value (< 2.2 × 10−16), confirming the high reproducibility of the analysis

The DNAm levels of the 10 DMPs quantified by pyrosequencing in the discovery cohort were found to be significantly differentially methylated between severe and mild/moderate cases, fully aligning with the results from the Infinium assay (Fig. 7A, B). This confirms that the results of the Infinium data were successfully (technically) validated by pyrosequencing. Both technical replicates in the discovery cohort showed highly consistent methylation levels, further supporting the reproducibility of the assay.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Methylation levels of DMPs in discovery and validation cohorts. Boxplots showing the distribution of DNAm levels for the 10 DMPs analyzed using pyrosequencing in the Discovery and Validation cohorts and in each replicate. The analysis includes seven CpG sites in the ZBTB38 gene and three CpG sites in the TRIM6-TRIM34 gene, confirming the reproducibility of methylation patterns across independent cohorts

In the Validation cohort, six of the seven DMPs within the ZBTB38 gene remained significantly differentially methylated, while the cg23371833 site showed a similar trend of hypomethylation in the severe group, albeit without reaching statistical significance (Fig. 7A). The three DMPs within the TRIM6-TRIM34 locus did not reach statistical significance in the validation cohort (Fig. 7B). However, when both cohorts were analyzed together (Table 5), all 10 DMPs reached statistical significance, reinforcing their role as robust prognostic biomarkers of RSV severity. These findings confirm the significant hypomethylation pattern observed in children with severe phenotype when compared to those with only mild to moderate symptoms, as identified in the discovery stage and in the Infinium assay.

Table 5 Differential methylation analysis by bisulfite pyrosequencing for each cohort of the study

Co-methylated modules were constructed using the WGCNA R package with the top 20% of probes exhibiting the highest mean–variance (n = 114,806). After testing a set of candidate powers, a soft-thresholding power of seven was selected based on the criterion of scale-free topology (Fig. 8A). The analysis revealed 32 modules, each containing at least 30 co-methylated genes, labeled by a color name (Fig. 8B). Applying a cutoff height threshold of 0.25 for module merging resulted in the identification of 21 modules. The module-trait relationships were tested by calculating the correlation between the modules and the severity phenotype (Fig. 8C), resulting in two significantly associated modules: RAB11FIP5 (green) and 2RX3 (magenta) (Fig. 8D). However, after adjusting for multiple testing, only the RAB11FIP5 module survived with a FDR P-value < 0.011. We found a strong correlation between GS and MM for this module, indicating that the CpGs associated with RSV severity are also core elements of that module (Fig. 9A).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Co-methylated modules associated with RSV severity. A Selection of the soft-thresholding power involved analyzing plots that depict the correlation between the soft-thresholding powers and two metrics: the scale-free fit index (left) and the mean connectivity (right). B Clustering dendrogram of probes, with dissimilarity based on topological overlap, together with assigned module colors. C Bar plot displaying the P-values from correlation tests between the module eigengenes and the RSV severity phenotype. The color of each module is defined by its hub gene. D Heatmap of Pearson correlation analysis of modules and the clinical traits associated with RSV severity. The rows represent the 21 module eigengenes, and the columns represent the phenotypes

A strong negative correlation (R = −0.77) between the RAB11FIP5 module and the trait was observed, indicating hypomethylation in the severely ill group compared to the mild/moderate group. This finding is consistent with the results obtained for DMPs and DMRs, where lower levels of methylation were observed in the severe group than in the mild/moderate group. The heatmap and sample eigengene plots strongly support these results, demonstrating an overall lower methylation value in the cohort of patients with severe symptoms (Fig. 9B, C). Within the RAB11FIP5 module, 153 CpGs of the previously identified 461 DMPs (33%) were included, of which 97 (21%) were considered hub CpGs (GS < −0.7 and MM > 0.8).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Strong negative correlation between the RAB11FIP5 module and RSV severity. A Plot of correlations between gene significance and module membership for the RAB11FIP5 module. Color coding is equivalent to module names. B Heatmap displaying the beta-values of the CpGs belonging to the RAB11FIP5 module. Additionally, the eigengene values of the samples are also shown. C Boxplot showing the variations in eigengene values of the samples from the RAB11FIP5 module between the severe and mild/moderate groups. D Dot plot showing the top KEGG pathways with an FDR < 0.01 associated with the genes in the RAB11FIP5 module. The size of each dot on the x-axis represents the number of genes associated with each pathway. Additionally, the color of each dot corresponds to the respective FDR P-values linked to the pathways

We identified a total of 1135 hub CpGs (hCpGs) within the RAB11FIP5 module (Table S3). Upon examining the cluster of these hCpGs falling within specific (hub) genes, six hCpGs were observed within the CUX1 and ANK3 genes, four within the ZBTB38, four in the body region of the SSBP3, and four within GLI3, FOXP1, and AFF3. The genes associated with the most significant module hCpGs were primarily involved in pathways related to the PI3K-Akt, MAPK, Rap1, and Ras signaling pathways (Fig. 9D).

Discussion

We present novel evidence suggesting the potential involvement of DNAm in the severity of RSV disease among children younger than 2 years. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt at using non-invasive buccal swab samples to investigate methylation biomarkers associated with varying degrees of severity following RSV infection. Despite the lack of extensive research on DNAm changes specifically related to RSV infection in saliva, the existing scientific literature provides compelling evidence that saliva, which contains both epithelial and immune cells, serves as the primary site for viral infection and subsequent initiation of the immune response during acute respiratory viral infections.

In our study, multiple CpG sites were identified in the ZBTB38 and TRIM6-TRIM34 genes in severe vs mild/moderate patients.

Upon analyzing the clinical history of the patients, we observed that severely ill children displayed more homogenous characteristics than those with mild/moderate symptoms. This pattern is clearly visible in the PCA built on DMPs of donors, where the mild/moderate group displayed greater variability,than the severe group. This difference could be attributed to the challenge of classifying patients as mild/moderate due to the diverse symptoms and age range.

Through DMP and DMR analysis, we identified two genes that were significantly differentially hypomethylated between severely ill children and those with only mild/moderate symptoms: ZBTB38 and TRIM6-TRIM34. Methylation patterns of both genes demonstrated high discriminatory power in distinguishing the two groups of infants, with ZBTB38 having an AUC of 0.984 and TRIM-6-TRIM-34 having an AUC of 0.906. These findings were further validated through pyrosequencing analysis in both the discovery and a new validation cohort, reinforcing the reliability of these methylation markers as prognostic indicators of RSV severity. ZBTB38, which contains seven statistically significant CpG sites, is a protein-coding gene that contains both zinc finger and BTB domains. It functions as a transcription factor and exhibits a strong affinity for methylated sequences in vitro, acting as a methyl-CpG binding protein. Recent research [34] has shown that ZBTB38 is hypomethylated and transcriptionally upregulated in adaptive NK cells. It binds to methylated CpG sites within DNA and plays a role in the negative regulation of apoptosis. This gene has also been implicated in asthma [35] and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [36], two conditions closely related to airway viral infections. TRIM6 is a member of the tripartite motif (TRIM) family, which is a group of proteins that are involved in a wide range of biological processes and are associated with various pathological conditions, including developmental disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, viral infection, and carcinogenesis. The TRIM6 gene plays a critical role in both the type I interferon (IFN-I) production and signaling pathways [37], and its absence inhibits IFN-I signaling leading to increased replication of interferon-sensitive viruses. A recent study on Ebola revealed that the knockout of TRIM6 reduces the replication of the virus, suggesting the gene’s significance as a host cellular factor for viral replication [38]. Similarly, the TRIM34 gene is significantly upregulated in response to IFN-I in macrophages, [39], and may limit HIV replication in a TRIM5-dependent manner [40]. In line with this evidence, the low methylation level observed in the DMPs belonging to this gene in severely ill children could suggest potential overexpression of this gene in this group of patients.

In our study, we observed that the DNAm levels at ZBTB38 gene in healthy controls were comparable to those in children with mild to moderate symptoms of RSV infection. This finding suggests that this gene exhibits a stable baseline methylation pattern under healthy conditions and mild RSV infection. The hypomethylation observed in severe RSV children for those CpGs implies that RSV infection may induce alterations in DNAm levels, particularly in those who develop severe manifestations of the disease. A general hypomethylation of CpGs in the whole blood of patients with bronchiolitis due to RSV or rhinovirus infections was confirmed by the study by Zhu et al. [16]. However, the specific DMPs identified in that study were not observed in our, possibly due to differences in tissue type.

Pathway analysis revealed intriguing enrichment in olfactory signaling, particularly the olfactory signaling pathway (R-HSA-381753), which is linked to genes differentially expressed during RSV infection [41]. Various animal models have demonstrated that certain viruses, such as Japanese encephalitis virus, influenza virus, and Herpes simplex virus, exploit the olfactory pathway to access the olfactory bulb (OB) and spread to other brain regions, including the hypothalamus and cortical areas [42]. While the mechanisms of RSV entry and spread in the CNS are not fully understood, a mouse model study in 2013 [43] demonstrated neuro-invasive ability of RSV through the olfactory pathway. More recently, Bryche and colleagues [44] detected RSV infection and replication in olfactory sensory neurons, leading to inflammation in the OB.

Through weighted correlation network analysis, a set of co-methylated positions with a significant negative correlation with severe RSV infection was identified. This suggests that the CpG blocks associated with these positions are hypomethylated, suggesting potential overactivation of these genes in severely infected children. The most important hub gene of the most significant module was RAB11FIP5, to which the hub position cg13662225 belongs. It has been reported that RAB11FIP plays a crucial role in regulating viral infections. For instance, RAB11FIP3 seems indispensable for the formation of filamentous virions [45]. RAB11FIP1 and RAB11FIP2 regulate the release of RSV [46], while RAB11FIP4 is essential for the movement of components related to cytomegalovirus (HCMV) [47]. The role of RAB11FIP5 in viral infection remained unclear until a recent study which [48] showed its correrlation to NK cell dysfunction, and the productionof broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) in HIV-1-infected individuals.

Among the other hCpGs (RAB11FIP5 module), four were located within the DMR of the previously described ZBTB38 gene. Additionally, four hub CpGs were found within the SSBP3 gene, whose expression tends to be upregulated in patients with RSV [49]. Another interesting gene is GLI3, which contains four hub CpGs that play essential roles in lung development and in the regulation of innate immune cells [50]. Furthermore, a cluster of hub CpGs was found within the ANK3 gene, encoding proteins that have been detected in various types of epithelial cells, bone marrow macrophages, and neurons. The upregulated expression of the ANK3 protein was reported [50] in alveolar macrophages of individuals with COPD, suggesting its potential involvement in lung function decline and COPD pathogenesis in at-risk smokers. Another gene associated with lung development regulation is FOXP1, which contains four CpGs that may contribute to the development of chronic lung diseases [51].

Further investigation of the RAB11FIP5 module revealed that the genes associated with the hub positions primarily participate in the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. This pathway has been shown to enhance viral entry into host cells [52], even if, recent studies have proposed that it can serve as a “proviral” kinase upon activation but plays a role in the host’s antiviral response. The second most significant pathway was related to MAPK signaling, which is generally activated by various chemical and physical stimuli, including cytokines, hormones, growth factors, pathogens (including viruses), etc. [53]. The effect of MAPK signaling on virus replication varies depending on the virus in question, as it can either support or downregulate replication [54]. Furthermore, viruses can exploit independently activated MAPK signaling pathways to facilitate their own replication. These two top pathways identified through co-methylation analysis—PI3K-Akt and MAPK—are consistent with findings from a recent RNA-based epigenetic study by Zhu et al. [55], which linked nasal miRNAs during severe bronchiolitis to asthma-related pathways, including PI3K-Akt. These pathways are not only involved in acute viral responses but also play a key role in shaping long-term respiratory outcomes such as asthma and COPD.

In line with these findings, it is important to consider that, in addition to RSV infection, these infants may have a high abundance of pathogenic bacteria in their airways. This interplay between respiratory viral infections and microbiome could significantly impact long-term outcomes such as asthma. As highlighted by this recent study of bronchiolitis in infants (56) understanding how these factors interact will be crucial for future research in elucidating the complex mechanisms leading to chronic respiratory diseases.

Conclusions

The present study represents the first attempt to investigate the role of DNAm in young children with different severities of RSV infection using non-invasive samples. The findings of this study provide compelling evidence indicating that DNAm may indeed contribute to the severity of RSV disease in young children at the local level. The consistency of validation results highlights the robustness of the identified methylation signatures and their potential clinical utility in predicting disease severity. However, further large-scale studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

It is important to note that while our results indicate a correlation between RSV severity and DNAm changes, causation cannot be definitively established from this study alone. It remains uncertain whether the observed methylation changes were already present in the group of children and predisposed them to severe RSV infection or if RSV infection itself directly influenced their methylation levels. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these methylation changes and their role in RSV pathogenesis.

Limitations of the study

One of the most important limitations of the present study is the small sample size of both the mild/moderate and severe groups. This limited size, combined with the extensive number of CpGs examined, increases the likelihood that some DNA probes did not reach the threshold for statistical significance at the minimum FDR level.

Another limitation pertains to age-related differences and their potential implications, as well as disparities between cohorts regarding previous episodes of bronchiolitis and other medical histories. We attempted to address these age variations through appropriate statistical analyses and by adjusting for age in all group comparisons. Future studies may benefit from more nuanced stratification of age cohorts or longitudinal analyses to better elucidate age-specific risk factors and outcomes. Additionally, it would be valuable to explore differential sex differences in disease severity in future studies using larger cohorts of both patients and controls.

Furthermore, the impact of previous episodes of bronchiolitis and other medical history on our study results warrants consideration. In this case, future analysis with a more homogeneous mild/moderate cohort is required to exclude any implications of previous events that could be implicated in DNAm changes.

Another limitation of the study is the unknown exact duration of symptoms before sample collection, which is a common issue in paedriatic research studies.

Despite these limitations, our findings could be validated in an independent cohort, and include promising candidate biomarkers related to RSV infection and severity and shed further light on the local mechanisms that might contribute to the severe phenotype, providing good proof of principle for non-invasive saliva samples.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author Antonio Salas upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ALRI:

Acute lower respiratory infection

ARI:

Acute respiratory infection

AUC:

Area under the curve

CNS:

Central nervous system

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

DMPs:

Differentially methylated positions/probes

DMRs:

Differentially methylated regions

DNAm:

DNA methylation

FDR:

False discovery rate

GO:

Gene Ontology

GS:

Gene significance

hCpGs:

Hub CpGs

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

MM:

Module Membership

OB:

Olfactory Bulb

PCA:

Principal component analysis

PICU:

Pediatric intensive unite care

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

RSV:

Respiratory syncytial virus

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

TOM:

Topological overlap matrix

References

  1. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Chu Y, Perin J, Zhu J, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. The Lancet. 2016;388(10063):3027–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shi T, McAllister DA, O’Brien KL, Simoes EAF, Madhi SA, Gessner BD, et al. Global, regional, and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children in 2015: a systematic review and modelling study. The Lancet. 2017;390(10098):946–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wildenbeest JG, Billard MN, Zuurbier RP, Korsten K, Langedijk AC, van de Ven PM, et al. The burden of respiratory syncytial virus in healthy term-born infants in Europe: a prospective birth cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2023;11(4):341–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Martinon-Torres F, Carmo M, Platero L, Drago G, Lopez-Belmonte JL, Bangert M, et al. Clinical and economic hospital burden of acute respiratory infection (BARI) due to respiratory syncytial virus in Spanish children, 2015–2018. BMC Infect Dis. 2023;23(1):385.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rha B, Curns AT, Lively JY, Campbell AP, Englund JA, Boom JA, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus-associated hospitalizations among young children: 2015–2016. Pediatrics. 2020. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1542/peds.2019-3611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pickles RJ, DeVincenzo JP. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and its propensity for causing bronchiolitis. J Pathol. 2015;235(2):266–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salas A, Pardo-Seco J, Cebey-Lopez M, Gomez-Carballa A, Obando-Pacheco P, Rivero-Calle I, et al. Whole Exome Sequencing reveals new candidate genes in host genomic susceptibility to respiratory syncytial virus disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):15888.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tahamtan A, Askari FS, Bont L, Salimi V. Disease severity in respiratory syncytial virus infection: role of host genetic variation. Rev Med Virol. 2019;29(2): e2026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mejias A, Dimo B, Suarez NM, Garcia C, Suarez-Arrabal MC, Jartti T, et al. Whole blood gene expression profiles to assess pathogenesis and disease severity in infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection. PLoS Med. 2013;10(11): e1001549.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chu CY, Qiu X, McCall MN, Wang L, Corbett A, Holden-Wiltse J, et al. Airway gene expression correlates of respiratory syncytial virus disease severity and microbiome composition in infants. J Infect Dis. 2021;223(9):1639–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McGinley JP, Lin GL, Öner D, Golubchik T, O’Connor D, Snape MD, et al. Clinical and viral factors associated with disease severity and subsequent wheezing in infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Infect Dis. 2022;226(Suppl 1):S45–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fonseca W, Lukacs NW, Ptaschinski C. Factors affecting the immunity to respiratory syncytial virus: from epigenetics to microbiome. Front Immunol. 2018;9:226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang L, Wu G, Qin X, Ma Q, Zhou Y, Liu S, et al. Expression of nodal on bronchial epithelial cells influenced by lung microbes through DNA methylation modulates the differentiation of T-helper cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;37(5):2012–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Syn G, Blackwell JM, Jamieson SE. Epigenetics in infectious diseases. In: Epigenetic biomarkers and diagnostics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2016. p. 377–400.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Pischedda S, Rivero-Calle I, Gomez-Carballa A, Cebey-Lopez M, Barral-Arca R, Gomez-Rial J, et al. Role and diagnostic performance of host epigenome in respiratory morbidity after RSV infection: the EPIRESVi study. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 875691.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu Z, Li Y, Freishtat RJ, Celedón JC, Espinola JA, Harmon B, et al. Epigenome-wide association analysis of infant bronchiolitis severity: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):5495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ashton NJ, Ide M, Zetterberg H, Blennow K. Salivary biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders. Neurol Ther. 2019;8(Suppl 2):83–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Farah R, Haraty H, Salame Z, Fares Y, Ojcius DM, Said SN. Salivary biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of neurological diseases. Biomed J. 2018;41(2):63–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zürcher C, Humpel C. Saliva: a challenging human fluid to diagnose brain disorders with a focus on Alzheimer’s disease. Neural Regen Res. 2023;18(12):2606–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Burnett GW, Scherp HW. Oral microbiology and infectious disease; a textbook for students and practitioners of dentistry. 2d ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1962. p. 1003.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Estevez O, Anibarro L, Garet E, Pallares A, Pena A, Villaverde C, et al. Identification of candidate host serum and saliva biomarkers for a better diagnosis of active and latent tuberculosis infection. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7): e0235859.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Alwafi HA, Ali SS, Kotha SB, Abuljadayel LW, Ibrahim M, Elahi IRN, et al. Elevated salivary inflammatory biomarkers are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection severity. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2022;2022:1543918.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramirez J, Carrico R, Wilde A, Junkins A, Furmanek S, Chandler T, et al. Diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus in adults substantially increases when adding sputum, saliva, and serology testing to nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR. Infect Dis Ther. 2023;12(6):1593–603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Justicia-Grande AJ, Martinon-Torres F. The ReSVinet score for bronchiolitis: a scale for all seasons. Am J Perinatol. 2019;36(02):S48–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng SC, Breeze CE, Beck S, Dong D, Zhu T, Ma L, et al. EpiDISH web server: epigenetic dissection of intra-sample-heterogeneity with online GUI. Bioinformatics. 2019;36(6):1950–1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng SC, Breeze CE, Beck S, Teschendorff AE. Identification of differentially methylated cell types in epigenome-wide association studies. Nat Methods. 2018;15(12):1059–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peters TJ, Buckley MJ, Statham AL, Pidsley R, Samaras K, Lord R, et al. De novo identification of differentially methylated regions in the human genome. Epigenet Chromatin. 2015;8:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shorey-Kendrick LE, McEvoy CT, Milner K, Harris J, Brownsberger J, Tepper RS, et al. Improvements in lung function following vitamin C supplementation to pregnant smokers are associated with buccal DNA methylation at 5 years of age. Clin Epigenetics. 2024;16(1):35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ren X, Kuan PF. methylGSA: a Bioconductor package and Shiny app for DNA methylation data length bias adjustment in gene set testing. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(11):1958–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu T, Hu E, Xu S, Chen M, Guo P, Dai Z, et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (Camb). 2021;2(3):100141.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McEwen LM, O’Donnell KJ, McGill MG, Edgar RD, Jones MJ, MacIsaac JL, et al. The PedBE clock accurately estimates DNA methylation age in pediatric buccal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(38):23329–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schlums H, Cichocki F, Tesi B, Theorell J, Beziat V, Holmes TD, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection drives adaptive epigenetic diversification of NK cells with altered signaling and effector function. Immunity. 2015;42(3):443–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu K, Gamazon ER, Im HK, Geeleher P, White SR, Solway J, et al. Genome-wide interrogation of longitudinal FEV1 in children with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(6):619–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sakornsakolpat P, Prokopenko D, Lamontagne M, Reeve NF, Guyatt AL, Jackson VE, et al. Genetic landscape of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease identifies heterogeneous cell-type and phenotype associations. Nat Genet. 2019;51(3):494–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Rajsbaum R, Versteeg GA, Schmid S, Maestre AM, Belicha-Villanueva A, Martinez-Romero C, et al. Unanchored K48-linked polyubiquitin synthesized by the E3-ubiquitin ligase TRIM6 stimulates the interferon-IKKepsilon kinase-mediated antiviral response. Immunity. 2014;40(6):880–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Bharaj P, Atkins C, Luthra P, Giraldo MI, Dawes BE, Miorin L, et al. The host E3-ubiquitin ligase TRIM6 ubiquitinates the ebola virus VP35 protein and promotes virus replication. J Virol. 2017. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/JVI.00833-17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hatakeyama S. TRIM family proteins: roles in autophagy, immunity, and carcinogenesis. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42(4):297–311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ohainle M, Kim K, Komurlu Keceli S, Felton A, Campbell E, Luban J, et al. TRIM34 restricts HIV-1 and SIV capsids in a TRIM5alpha-dependent manner. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(4): e1008507.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Barral-Arca R, Gomez-Carballa A, Cebey-Lopez M, Bello X, Martinon-Torres F, Salas A. A meta-analysis of multiple whole blood gene expression data unveils a diagnostic host-response transcript signature for respiratory syncytial virus. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(5):1831.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Forrester JV, McMenamin PG, Dando SJ. CNS infection and immune privilege. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(11):655–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Espinoza JA, Bohmwald K, Cespedes PF, Gomez RS, Riquelme SA, Cortes CM, et al. Impaired learning resulting from respiratory syncytial virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(22):9112–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Bryche B, Fretaud M, Saint-Albin Deliot A, Galloux M, Sedano L, Langevin C, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus tropism for olfactory sensory neurons in mice. J Neurochem. 2020;155(2):137–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wilson GM, Fielding AB, Simon GC, Yu X, Andrews PD, Hames RS, et al. The FIP3-Rab11 protein complex regulates recycling endosome targeting to the cleavage furrow during late cytokinesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16(2):849–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Utley TJ, Ducharme NA, Varthakavi V, Shepherd BE, Santangelo PJ, Lindquist ME, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus uses a Vps4-independent budding mechanism controlled by Rab11-FIP2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(29):10209–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Krzyzaniak MA, Mach M, Britt WJ. HCMV-encoded glycoprotein M (UL100) interacts with Rab11 effector protein FIP4. Traffic. 2009;10(10):1439–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Bradley T, Peppa D, Pedroza-Pacheco I, Li D, Cain DW, Henao R, et al. RAB11FIP5 expression and altered natural killer cell function are associated with induction of HIV broadly neutralizing antibody responses. Cell. 2018;175(2):387-99.e17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Feng Q, Feng Z, Yang B, Han S, Wen S, Lu G, et al. Metatranscriptome reveals specific immune and microbial signatures of respiratory syncytial virus infection in children. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(2): e0410722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Matissek SJ, Elsawa SF. GLI3: a mediator of genetic diseases, development and cancer. Cell Commun Signal. 2020;18(1):54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Andreas A, Maloy A, Nyunoya T, Zhang Y, Chandra D. The FoxP1 gene regulates lung function, production of matrix metalloproteinases and inflammatory mediators, and viability of lung epithelia. Respir Res. 2022;23(1):281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Dunn EF, Connor JH. HijAkt: the PI3K/Akt pathway in virus replication and pathogenesis. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2012;106:223–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Kumar R, Khandelwal N, Thachamvally R, Tripathi BN, Barua S, Kashyap SK, et al. Role of MAPK/MNK1 signaling in virus replication. Virus Res. 2018;253:48–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rodriguez ME, Brunetti JE, Wachsman MB, Scolaro LA, Castilla V. Raf/MEK/ERK pathway activation is required for Junin virus replication. J Gen Virol. 2014;95(Pt 4):799–805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhu Z, Freishtat RJ, Harmon B, Hahn A, Teach SJ, Pérez-Losada M, et al. Nasal airway microRNA profiling of infants with severe bronchiolitis and risk of childhood asthma: a multicentre prospective study. Eur Respir J. 2023. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1183/13993003.00502-2023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhu Z, Shibata R, Hoffman KL, Cormier J, Mansbach JM, Liang L, et al. Integrated nasopharyngeal airway metagenome and asthma genetic risk endotyping of severe bronchiolitis in infancy and risk of childhood asthma. Eur Respir J. 2024. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1183/13993003.01130-2024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

GENDRES Consortium: Miriam Cebey López (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Ana Vega Gliemmo (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), José Peña Guitián (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Carmen Curros Novo (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Rosaura Leis Trabazo (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Nazareth Martinón Torres (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), José María Martinón Sánchez (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Belén Mosquera Pérez (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Lorenzo Redondo Collazo (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Carmen Rodríguez-Tenreiro (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Miriam Taboada Puga (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Ana Cotovad Bellas (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Ana María Pastoriza Morelle (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Silvia Cerqueiro Rey (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Sara Rey Vázquez (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Ana María Senín Ferreiro (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Sonia Serén Fernández (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Maria Soledad Vilas Iglesias (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Mirian Ben García (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Patricia Regueiro Casuso (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Lara Martinez Martinez (Área Asistencial Integrada de Pediatría and GENVIP, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Máximo Francisco Fraga Rodríguez (Biobank, Servicio Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Orlando Fernández Lago (Biobank, Servicio Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), José Ramón Antúnez (Biobank, Servicio Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela), Carmen Martínez Padilla (Hospital Universitario de Jaén, Jaén), Jesús de la Cruz Moreno (Hospital Universitario de Jaén, Jaén), Eugenia Villanueva Martínez (Hospital Universitario de Jaén, Jaén), Ana González Espín (Hospital Universitario de Jaén, Jaén), María de las Mercedes Martínez Rebollo (Hospital Universitario de Jaén, Jaén), María Rocío Martín Moya (Hospital Universitario de Jaén, Jaén), M. Victoria Ramos Casado (Hospital Universitario 12 de octubre, Madrid), Pablo Rojo (Hospital Universitario 12 de octubre, Madrid), Palacios Cuesta Alba (Hospital Universitario 12 de octubre, Madrid), Francisco Javier Pilar Orive (Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Barakaldo, Bizkaia), Carla Pintos Tubert (Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Barakaldo, Bizkaia), Diego García Urabayen (Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Barakaldo, Bizkaia), Esteban Gomez Sanchez (Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos), Juan Valencia Ramos (Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos), Jesús López-Herce (Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid), Débora Sanz Alvarez (Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid), Cristina Calvo (Hospital Infantil La Paz, Madrid), Sonia Alcolea (Hospital Infantil La Paz, Madrid), Rocio Sánchez (Hospital Infantil La Paz, Madrid), Jorge Atucha (Hospital Infantil La Paz, Madrid), Jara Hurtado (Hospital Infantil La Paz, Madrid), Ana López Fernández (Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense – CHUO, Ourense), Clara Gil González (Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense – CHUO, Ourense), Teresa González López (Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense – CHUO, Ourense), Delfina Suarez Vázquez (Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense – CHUO, Ourense), Ángela Vázquez Vázquez (Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense – CHUO, Ourense), Susana Rey García (Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense – CHUO, Ourense), Nathalie Carreira Sande (Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense – CHUO, Ourense), Nuria Romero Pérez (Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense – CHUO, Ourense), Diego Bautista Lozano (Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid), Alcaraz Romero Andres Jose (Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid), Sara Guillen Martin (Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid), Ana Pérez Aragón (Hospital Universitario Virgen de las nieves, Granada), Catalina Ortiz Paredes (Hospital Universitario Virgen de las nieves, Granada), María Teresa Rives Ferreiro (Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra), Jose Luis Moreno Salgado (Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez de Huelva, Huelva), Olalla Moyano Leiva (Hospital Materno-Infantil de Malaga, Malaga), Carla Taboada Rubinos (Hospital Materno Infantil de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria), Ana Capilla Miranda (Hospital Comarcal de la Merced en Osuna, Sevilla), Jorge Contreras (Hospital Comarcal de la Merced en Osuna, Sevilla), Andrés Concha Torre (Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo), Elena del Castillo Navío (Hospital Materno Infantil de Badajoz, Badajoz), Ana Grande Tejada (Hospital Materno Infantil de Badajoz, Badajoz), Alfredo Tagarro García (Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid), María Luisa Herreros (Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid), Libertad Latorre Navarro (Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid), Rut del Valle (Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid), Laura Moreno Galarraga (Hospital Materno Infantil/Hospital Virgen del Camino, Pamplona), Enrique Bernaola Iturbe (Hospital Materno Infantil/Hospital Virgen del Camino, Pamplona), Jorge Álvarez (Hospital Materno Infantil/Hospital Virgen del Camino, Pamplona), Mercedes Herranz (Hospital Materno Infantil/Hospital Virgen del Camino, Pamplona), Francisco Gil (Hospital Materno Infantil/Hospital Virgen del Camino, Pamplona), Eva Gembero (Hospital Materno Infantil/Hospital Virgen del Camino, Pamplona), Jorge Rodríguez (Hospital Materno Infantil/Hospital Virgen del Camino, Pamplona), María Luz García García (Hospital Severo Ochoa, Madrid), Cristina Calvo Rey (Hospital Severo Ochoa, Madrid), Iciar Olabarrieta Arnal (Hospital Severo Ochoa, Madrid), Adelaida Fernández Rincón (Hospital Severo Ochoa, Madrid), Susana Beatriz Reyes (Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca de Murcia, Murcia), María Cruz León León (Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca de Murcia, Murcia), Santiago Alfayate (Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca de Murcia, Murcia), Beatriz Mercader (Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca de Murcia, Murcia), Francisco Giménez Sánchez (Hospital Inmaculada, Granada), Elvira González Salas (Hospital Clínico de Salamanca, Salamanca), Sira Fernández De Miguel (Hospital Clínico de Salamanca, Salamanca), Alfredo Tagarro García (Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid), María Concepción Zazo Sanchidrián (Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante), Esteban García-Fontecha (Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante), Marta González Lorenzo (Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante), Mariano Esteban (Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante), María Carmen Vicent Castello (Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante), Lorena Moreno Requena (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada, Granada), César Gavilán Martín (Hospital Universitario de San Juan de Alicante, Alicante), Monterrat López Franco (Hospital de Burela, Lugo), Mª Nieves Glez Bravo (Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Canarias), María Jesús Cabero (Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander), Marta Pareja (Hospital General de Albacete, Albacete), Adriana Navas Carretero (Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid), Elvira Cobo Vazquez (Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Madrid), Patricia Flores Perez (Hospital Niño Jesús, Madrid), María Yolanda Ruiz del Prado (Hospital San Pedro, La Rioja), José Antonio Couceiro Gianzo (Hospital Pontevedra, Pontevedra), Nazareth Fuentes Perez (Hospital Pontevedra, Pontevedra), Roi Piñeiro (Hospital General de Villalba, Madrid), Belen Joyanes Abancens (Hospital clínico San Carlos, Madrid), Carlos Rodrigo Gonzalo de Liria (Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Cataluña), Maria Méndez (Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Cataluña), Francisco Giménez Sánchez (Hospital Torrecárdenas, Almería), Miguel Sánchez Forte (Hospital Torrecárdenas, Almería), María José Cilleruelo Ortega (Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid), Luz Golmayo (Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid), Francisca Portero Azorín (Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid)

The authors would like to express their appreciation to the study investigators of the GENDRES network (www.gendres.org), as well as the nursery and laboratory service at the Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, for their invaluable dedication and support. This research project was made possible through the access granted by the Galician Supercomputing Center (CESGA) to its supercomputing infrastructure. The supercomputer FinisTerrae III and its permanent data storage system were funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, the Galician Government, and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Funding

This study received support by i) Instituto de Salud Carlos III [ISCIII]: TRINEO: PI22/00162; DIAVIR: DTS19/00049; Resvi-Omics: PI19/01039 [to AS]. ReSVinext: PI16/01569; Enterogen: PI19/01090; OMI-COVI-VAC: PI22/00406 [to F.M.T.]; CP23/00080 [to AGC]; PI24/00771 [to SP]) and co-funded by the European Union; ii) GAIN: IN607B 2020/08 and IN607 A 2023/02 [to A.S.]; GEN-COVID: IN845D 2020/23 and IIN607 A2021/05 [to F.M.-T.] and IN677D 2024/06 [to A.G.C.]; iii) ACIS: BI-BACVIR PRIS-3, CovidPhy SA304 C, PneumoTrack PRIST-VAL [to AS] and Respisal PRIST-VAL [to F.M.T.]; iv) consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias CB21/06/00103; [to F.M.T. and A.S.]; and v) Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIN)/Spanish Research Agency (AEI) KAWA-TesT: PID2022-142156OB-I00 [to A.G-.C]. The funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

A.S. and F.M.T. conceived and designed the study, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. S.P. carried out the data analysis and drafted the initial manuscript. I.R.C. and A.D.U. were involved in sample recruitment and collection of clinical data. A.S., A.G.C., J.P.S., and X.B. supervised the data analysis and revised the manuscript. M.J.C.T., S.V.L., and A.C.M. reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Salas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Clinical Investigation of Galicia (CEIC 2016/484). Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participant’s legal guardian/next of kin. This project is conducted following the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice, with the current national regulations (Law 14/2007 on Biomedical Research), and with the ethical principles established in the Declaration of Helsinki. The confidentiality of the data of the study participants will be guaranteed, ensuring compliance with Organic Law 3/2018, of December 5, on the Protection of Personal Data and guarantee of digital rights.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

Ana Isabel Dacosta Urbieta has participated in clinical trials for RSV vaccines and monoclonals with all honoraria paid to the institution. Irene Rivero Calle has received honoraria from GSK, Pfizer, Sanofi, and MSD for taking part in advisory boards and expert meetings and acting as a speaker in congresses outside the scope of the submitted work. IRC has also acted as sub-investigator in randomized controlled trials of Abbot, Astrazeneca, Enanta, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Medimmune, Merck, Moderna, MSD, Novavax, Pfizer, Reviral, Roche, Sanofi Pasteur, and Seqirus.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

13072_2025_587_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Additional file 1. A. Scatter plot of DNAm age (biological age) and chronological age in the two groups. B. Comparison between chronological and predicted biological age between the severe and mild/moderate groups.

13072_2025_587_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Additional file 2. Boxplots showing DNA methylation levels at three DMPs within TRIM6-TRIM34 for the RSV cohort compared to the HC cohort from GEO. The HC cohort includes children at three-time points: birth, 12 months, and 60 months (5 years).

Additional file 3.

Additional file 4.

Additional file 5.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pischedda, S., Gómez-Carballa, A., Pardo-Seco, J. et al. DNA methylation signatures of severe RSV infection in infants: evidence from non-invasive saliva samples. Epigenetics & Chromatin 18, 25 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13072-025-00587-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13072-025-00587-5

Keywords